Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 Md. App. 709 - Smiley v. State

138 Md. App. 709 - Smiley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2021

14 state decisions

100200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 845

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Albrecht · MacK v. State · Dawkins v. State · West v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As to proof of intent, we have stated that an intent to distribute controlled dangerous substances is seldom proved directly, but is more often found by drawing inferences from facts proved which reasonably indicate under all the circumstances the existence of the required intent. Likewise, an intent to distribute may be indicated by the very quantity of narcotics possessed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.