Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 MINN 72 - Stevens v. Pearson

Stevens v. Pearson’s Empirical Analysis

1917

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
5
states following
September 1932
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently September 1932

8 state decisions

30191719201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blossom v. . Dodd · Insurance Company v. Slaughter · Bank of Montreal v. Beecher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The attached note is tendered in settlement of this order and the company is authorized to detach same when this order is approved and shipped.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.