McFadin v. Catron’s Empirical Analysis
1897
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently July 1942 · most notably Loehr v. Starke (1933), Graney v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. (1900)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Hardin · Bancroft v. Otis · Cudney v. . Cudney · State v. Duestrow · McFadin v. Catron
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ It is not sufficient to show that the circumstances attending its execution are consistent with the hypothesis of its having been obtained by undue influence. It must be shown that they are inconsistent with a contrary hypothesis.” Boyse v. Rossborough,, 6 H. L. Cas. 2.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nelson v. Wiggins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.