Mitchell Planing Mill Co. v. Allison’s Empirical Analysis
1897
Citation profile
42 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently June 1983 · most notably Oliver L. Taetz, Inc. v. Groff (1953), Harry Cooper Supply Co. v. Gillioz, 5560 (mo.banc 6-16-1937) (1937)
42 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Ittner v. Hughes · Grace v. Nesbitt · Coe v. Ritter · McDermott v. Claas · Hilliker v. Francisco
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The account which this law contemplates is such a statement of the claim as fairly apprises the owner and the public of the nature and amount of the demand asserted as a lien. The account may consist of one or more items. It may be all on one side, or mutual in its showing. To be valid, however, it must disclose on its face that the demand is of a sort within the terms of the lien law. The affidavit required to verify the account may be considered along with the account itself in ascertaining the sufficiency of the latter.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lanier v. Lovett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.