Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 Mont. 69 - Bacus v. Lake County

Bacus v. Lake County’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

57
cited by 57 later decisions
3
states following
August 2013
most recently cited

57 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 57 later decisions — most recently August 2013 · most notably Williams v. Board of County Commissioners (2013), Lee v. State (1981)

57 state decisions

190196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sapero v. State Board of Medical Examiners · State ex rel. Redman v. Meyers · State Ex Rel. City of Missoula v. Holmes · State v. Johnson · Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co. v. Board of Railroad Commissioners

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 57 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The law-making power may not be granted to an administrative body to be exercised under the guise of administrative discretion. Accordingly, in delegating powers to an administrative body with respect to the administration of statutes, the legislature must ordinarily prescribe a policy, standard, or rule for their guidance and must not vest them with an arbitrary and uncontrolled discretion with regard thereto, and a statute or ordinance which is deficient in this respect is invalid.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"`Delegation of power to determine who are within the operation of the law is not a delegation of legislative power. * * * But it is essential that the Legislature shall fix some standard by which the officer or board to whom the power is delegated may be governed, and not left to be controlled by caprice.' "We agree with this statement of the law and go further by saying that the standard must not be so broad that the officer or board will have unascertainable limits within which to act."”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The powers of the government of this state are divided into three distinct departments: The legislative, executive and judicial, and no person or collection of persons charged with the exercise of powers properly belonging to one of these departments shall exercise any powers properly belonging to either of the others, except as in this constitution expressly directed or permitted.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.