Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 N.C. App. 392 - State v. Clark

138 N.C. App. 392 - State v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 2007
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · Allison v. United States · Rust v. Johnson · State v. Hennis · White v. VanSickel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A prosecutor’s presentation of known false evidence, allowed to go uncorrected, is a violation of a defendant’s right to due process. The State has a duty to correct any false evidence which in any reasonable likelihood could affect the jury’s decision. However, if the evidence is inconsistent or contradictory, rather than a knowing falsehood, such contradictions in the State’s evidence are for the jury to consider and resolve.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`[a] trial court may be reversed for abuse of discretion only upon a showing that its ruling was manifestly unsupported by reason and could not have been the result of a reasoned decision.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.