138 N.C. App. 392 - State v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
June 2007
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Napue v. People of the State of Illinois · Allison v. United States · Rust v. Johnson · State v. Hennis · White v. VanSickel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A prosecutor’s presentation of known false evidence, allowed to go uncorrected, is a violation of a defendant’s right to due process. The State has a duty to correct any false evidence which in any reasonable likelihood could affect the jury’s decision. However, if the evidence is inconsistent or contradictory, rather than a knowing falsehood, such contradictions in the State’s evidence are for the jury to consider and resolve.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`[a] trial court may be reversed for abuse of discretion only upon a showing that its ruling was manifestly unsupported by reason and could not have been the result of a reasoned decision.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.