Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 N.C. App. 506 - State v. Robertson

138 N.C. App. 506 - State v. Robertson’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Jolly · State v. . Sawyer · State v. Gerald · State v. . Murphy · 83 Md. App. 237 - Bryant v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In short, the victim must be induced to part with her property as a result of the violence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he only force used by defendant was that sufficient to remove her purse from her shoulder. Defendant never attempted to overpower her or otherwise restrain her. Rather, this was no more than atypical purse-snatching incident, which courts in other jurisdictions routinely have held to be larceny, not robbery.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The taking of property from the person of another by surprise, as by sudden snatching, does not constitute robbery . . . the sudden snatching of a purse or other property from a person's hand is not robbery[,] the offense constitutes larceny.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.