Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 N.J. 481 - State v. Brown

State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

131
cited by 131 later decisions
3
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

131 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 131 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably State v. Marshall (1997), State v. Afanador (1997)

131 state decisions

640199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on California v. Green · Caldwell v. Mississippi · National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · Delaware v. Fensterer · Schad v. Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 131 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he significance of the own-conduct determination in triggering the penalty phase supports the conclusion that jurors must be instructed on the nonunanimity option.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “`is not an element of the offense of murder [but is] merely a triggering device for the death-penalty phase of the trial.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “its determination establishes whether that defendant will be eligible for the death penalty. Although the consequences of the own-conduct determination and the penalty-phase verdict are not identical, the analogy is compelling. In the context of determining whether a jury should be informed of its non-unanimous option, any distinction is inconsequential. [Id. at 516-17.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.