Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 N.J. Super. 164 - Eckmeyer v. Colburn

138 N.J. Super. 164 - Eckmeyer v. Colburn’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
March 1983
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 136 N.J. Super. 491 - Pa. Mfrs. Assn. Ins. Co. v. Gov't Emp. Ins. Co. · 133 N.J. Super. 492 - Cirelli v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Evidence of the amounts collectible or paid pursuant to sections 4 and 10 of this act to an injured person is inadmissible in a civil action for recovery of damages for bodily injury by such injured person.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Any insurer paying benefits in accordance with the provisions of section 4 and section 10, personal injury protection coverage, regardless of fault, shall be subrogated to the rights of any party to whom it makes such payments, to the extent of such payments. Such subrogated insurer may only by intercompany arbitration or by intercompany agreement exercise its subrogation rights against only the insurer of any person liable for such damages in tort provided, however, that such insurer may exercise its subrogation rights directly against any person required to have in effect the coverage required by this act and who failed to have such coverage in effect at the time of the accident. The exemption from tort liability provided in section 8 does not apply to the insurers’ subrogation rights. On and after 2 years from the effective date of this act the provisions of this section shall be inoperative.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.