Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 N.M. 414 - State v. Duran

State v. Duran’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

94
cited by 94 later decisions
2
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

2 district · 92 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 94 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably State v. Leyva (2011), State v. Hubble (2009)

2 district · 92 state decisions

480200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Delaware v. Prouse · Berkemer v. McCarty · Florida v. Bostick · Pennsylvania v. Mimms

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]ll questions asked by police officers during a traffic stop must be analyzed to ensure they are reasonably related to the initial justification for the stop or are supported by reasonable suspicion.... [T]his determination must also include an examination of both the length of the detention and the manner in which it is carried out. The length of the detention should be reasonably limited to the time it takes to complete the underlying justification for the stop. Further, the scope of the questioning should be limited, as well.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Whether a search and seizure was constitutional is a mixed question of law and fact.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[a]n officer who makes a valid investigatory stop may briefly detain those he suspects of criminal activity to verify or quell that suspicion. The scope of activities during an investigatory detention must be reasonably related to the circumstances that initially justified the stop.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.