Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 N.M. 44 - State v. Jose S.

State v. Jose S.’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 2019
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Herrera · State v. ADAM M. · In Re Ruben D. · State ex rel. Brandenburg v. Blackmer · State v. Augustine R.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The language of unambiguous [statutory] provisions must be given effect without further interpretation. Only ambiguous provisions require us to delve into the legislative purpose behind the statute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.