State v. Monteleone’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

42 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “To determine whether the evidence discovered by the officers' search should have been suppressed under the `fruit of the poisonous tree' doctrine, we determine whether the officers obtained [the d]efendant's consent by means sufficiently distinguishable to be purged of the primary taint.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. State v. Figueroa

2. “To determine whether there was sufficient attenuation, we consider the temporal proximity of the arrest and the consent, the presence of intervening circumstances, and the flagrancy of the official misconduct.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. State v. Figueroa

3. “[w]e review de novo whether the district court correctly applied the law to the facts, viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the prevailing party.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Gutierrez