Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 Okla. 123 - Avery v. Goodrich

Avery v. Goodrich’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
March 1963
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 1963

14 state decisions

8019291930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Board of Trade v. Christie Grain & Stock Co. · Clews v. Jamieson · Poynter v. Beacon Falls Rubber Co. · Baker & Strawn v. Magnolia Petroleum Co. · McGhee v. Hurst

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The judge who presides at the trial of a case, hears the testimony of the witnesses, observes their demeanor,, and has a full knowledge of the proceedings had and done during the process of the trial, is in a better position to know whether or not substantial justice has been done than any other person. Where such judge sustains a motion for a new trial, it will require a clear showing of manifest error and an abuse of discretion before the appellate court will be justified in reversing such ruling of the trial court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.