Ex Parte Dickison’s Empirical Analysis
1928
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1973
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Yick Wo v. Hopkins · Harry Gundling v. City of Chicago · Higgins v. McCrea · Royall v. State of Virginia · Adams v. Standard Oil Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is probable that, in the absence of any grant of power from the sovereignty, the city would have authority under police power to enact regulatory ordinances, restricted, as it would be, as to the amount of license fee to be charged, to the cost of issuance and regulation.” Ex parte Simmons, 5 Okla Cr. 399, 115 Pac. 380 ; Ex parte Bochmann, 20 Okla. Cr. 78 , 201 Pac. 537 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“' “Section 581, R. L. 1910, empowers municipal authorities to impose a license tax for revenue, as distinguished from a license fee collected on account of necessary police regulation.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ex Parte Marler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.