State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2008
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Blakely v. Washington · Great State Beverages, Inc. v. Wenners · Attwood v. Singletary · 125 Wash. 2d 24 - State v. Russell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if the course of proceeding is not specifically pointed out by statute, any suitable process or mode of proceeding may be adopted which may appear most conformable to the spirit of the laws.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“`whether juries may be given special verdict forms or interrogatories to determine aggravating factors at trial.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davis“the victim was particularly vulnerable and incapable of resistance due to extreme youth.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.