¶1I concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice Blease upon the specific ground that the charge as applicable to the testimony in this case was free from error. A case might be presented where there was testimony tending to show that the defendants were guilty of different’ degrees of crime, in which event the charge as given would be erroneous.
138 S.C. 421
136 S.E 736
State v. West
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided February 21, 1927
Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1927-02-21
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 2008
3 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1927-02-21
View the full empirical analysis of this case →