Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 SO2D 691 - Williams v. Langston

Williams v. Langston’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
February 1985
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 1985

7 state decisions

50196219701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hanton v. New Orleans & C. R., Light & Power Co. · Blasingame v. Anderson · Rader v. Pegram · 19 So. 2d 657 - Dupuy v. Graeme Spring Brake Service · Ayres v. Wyatt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Defendant has neither appealed nor answered the appeal, and though he prays in his brief that the judgment of the District Court be reversed, we are powerless to alter or amend the judgment in his favor. See Succession of Babin, 213 La. 950 , 35 So.2d 864 ; Blasingame v. Anderson, 236 La. 505 , 108 So.2d 105 ; Rader v. Rader, La.App., 126 So.2d 189 ; Vogt v. Del Mar Homes, Inc., La.App., 131 So.2d 926 ; C.P. Articles 592, 888, 889; see also LSA-C.C.P. Art. 2133.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.