Davis v. Hindman’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Karpinsky v. American National Insurance Co. · 909 So. 2d 47 - PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc. v. Lowery · Smith v. HC Bailey Companies · 882 So. 2d 229 - Brooks v. Roberts · 759 So. 2d 1117 - Owens v. Thomae
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Should it appear from the affidavits of a party opposing the motion that he cannot for reasons stated present by affidavit facts essential to justify his opposition, the court may refuse the application for judgment or may order a continuance to permit affidavits to be obtained or depositions to be taken or discovery to be had or may make such order as it just.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The [circuit] court has sound discretion to grant or deny a continuance under Rule 56(f) ... [and our Court] will only reverse a [circuit] court where its decision can be characterized as an abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.