Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 TEX 79 - Sheffield v. Burch

Sheffield v. Burch’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
May 1981
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 1981

3 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

11019411950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. El Paso Sash Door Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is settled * * * that in order to constitute a mining partnership arising by operation of law there must not be only joint interest in the mining property but joint operation thereof as well. Joint ownership without joint operation merely constitutes cotenancy. To constitute a mining partnership it is essential that there be an actual working of the mine by the partnership.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.