138 Tex. Crim. 625 - Wallace v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1940
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1987
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 81 Tex. Crim. 359 - Taylor v. State · Rice v. Roberts · 83 Tex. Crim. 169 - Patterson v. State · 83 Tex. Crim. 465 - Ex Parte Fread · 110 Tex. Crim. 148 - Ballinger v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We are of the opinion that the order here requested did not involve the exercise of judicial discretion but was a ministerial act. Therefore when appellant notified Judge Gist that the affidavit had been filed and requested him to make an order directing the court reporter (who was then under his control and direction) to prepare the statement of the facts, Judge Gist should have complied with the request. This court has held an appellant’s right to a statement of facts, upon proper presentation of a pauper’s affidavit, to be absolute, and that no discretion was invested in the trial court to refuse the same.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.