Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 U.S. 562 - Schell v. Fauch E

Schell v. Fauch E’s Empirical Analysis

138 U.S. 562 · 1891

Citation profile

116
cited by 116 later decisions
19
cited 19 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 12 district · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 116 later decisions (19 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2024 · most notably Myers v. United States (1926), Fairbank v. United States (1901)

13 federal appellate · 12 district · 21 state decisions

21018911900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on William Cary and Samuel Cary v. Edward Curtis · Arthur v. Morgan · Edwards' Lessee v. Darby · Stuart v. Laird

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 116 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A protest which indicates to an intelligent man the ground of the importer’s objection to the duties levied upon the articles should not be discarded because of the brevity with which the objection is stated.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “* * * If, however, the papers are not connected together in fact, they are not considered as connected in law, unless, at least, the paper signed refers in some way to the other, which may then be construed as forming a part of it. Hinde v. Whitehouse (7 East, 558) ; Kenworthy v. Schofield (2 B. & C., 945). The proper test is, whether a person reading these papers would be deceived or misled as to the actual intention of the writer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A protest is not required to be made with technical precision, but is sufficient if it shows fairly that the objection afterwards made at'the trial was in the mind of the party and was brought to the knowledge of the collector, so as to secure to the Government the practical advantage which the statute was designed to secure.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.