Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 U.S. 573 - Heath v. Wallace

Heath v. Wallace’s Empirical Analysis

138 U.S. 573 · 1891

Citation profile

168
cited by 168 later decisions
28
cited 28 times by the Supreme Court
19
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

56 federal appellate · 11 district · 42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 168 later decisions (28 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2025 · most notably United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Ass'n (1897), United States v. Ju Toy (1905)

56 federal appellate · 11 district · 42 state decisions — followed in 19 states

33018911900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on St.louis Smelting and Refining Company v. Kemp. · Jones v. United States · Johnson v. Towsley · Steel v. St Louis Smelting Refining · Cragin v. Powell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 168 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is settled by an unbroken line of decisions of this court in land jurisprudence that the decisions of that department upofl matters of fact within its jurisdiction are, in the absence of fraud or imposition, conclusive and binding on the courts of the country.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the question whether or not lands returned as ‘ subject to periodical overflow ’ are ‘ swamp and overflowed lands ’ is a question of fact properly determinable by the Land Department.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.