Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 U.S. 623 - Gormley v. Bunyan

Gormley v. Bunyan’s Empirical Analysis

138 U.S. 623 · 1891

Citation profile

102
cited by 102 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
July 1981
most recently cited

58 federal appellate · 9 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 102 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1981 · most notably Mills v. Green (1895), Eva Ingersoll v. Joseph a Coram a H (1908)

58 federal appellate · 9 district · 7 state decisions

2401891190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. Barney · Leffingwell v. Warren · Amy v. Dubuque · Mandeville and Jamesson v. Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 102 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The only way in which such statutes [of limitation] are available as' a defense is when they are, at the proper time, specially pleaded.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.