Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 U.S. 694 - Anderson v. Watt

Anderson v. Watt’s Empirical Analysis

138 U.S. 694 · 1891

Citation profile

395
cited by 395 later decisions
41
cited 41 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

126 federal appellate · 47 district · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 395 later decisions (41 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2025 · most notably McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. (1936), Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L. P. (2004)

126 federal appellate · 47 district · 20 state decisions — followed in 11 states

55018911900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mullen v. Torrance · Morris v. Gilmer · Rubber Company v. Goodyear · Robertson v. Cease

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 395 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “declares all citizens of the United States to be citizens 'of the state where they reside.'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““If each of the indispensable adverse parties is not competent to sue or he sued, then the circuit court cannot maintain cognizance of the suit.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““And the inquiry is determined by the condition of the parties at the commencement of the suit.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.