Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 Wash. 59 - In Re Stuart

In Re Stuart’s Empirical Analysis

1926

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
6
states following
December 1975
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently December 1975

18 state decisions

60192619301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McDonald v. Short · Porter v. Porter · Clark v. White · Morin v. Morin · Brown v. Robertson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In all cases and texts that have been cited and that we have examined, it is uniformly held that a writ of habeas corpus will only be granted, in the case of an infant, where the applicant shows a prima facie legal right to the custody of the infant.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.