State v. Dolson’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2009
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Bell v. Burson · 127 Wash. 2d 270 - State v. Rogers · State v. Storhoff · 49 Wash. App. 778 - State v. Baker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A driver's license cannot be revoked without due process of law. Due process requires that the license holder be given notice and an opportunity to be heard prior to the revocation. The notice must be "reasonably calculated to inform the affected [sic] party of the pending action and of the opportunity to object." The State bears the burden of proving that the revocation complied with due process. If the revocation does not comply with due process, it is void.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“other means as designated by rule of the department.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“`Not Deliverable as Addressed, UNABLE TO FORWARD.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.