Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 W. Va. 660 - Vest v. Cobb

138 W. Va. 660 - Vest v. Cobb’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

120
cited by 120 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

120 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 120 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably State v. General Daniel Morgan Post No. 548 (1959), State v. General Daniel Morgan Post No. 548 (1959)

120 state decisions

2701953196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dent v. State of West Virginia · 135 W. Va. 877 - State v. Epperly · Lambert v. Yellowley · 121 W. Va. 319 - Chapman v. Huntington, West Virginia, Housing Authority · 129 W. Va. 722 - State Ex Rel. Cosner v. See

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 120 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hen a statute is clear and unambiguous and the legislative intent is plain, the statute should not be interpreted by the courts, and in such case it is the duty of the courts not to construe but to apply the statute.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[i]t is a cardinal rule of statutory construction that a statute should be construed as a whole, so as to give effect, if possible, to every word, phrase, paragraph and provision thereof[.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “This Court should not, and will not, control the policy of the Legislature in the valid exercise of the police power of the State pertaining to the public health. Our duty is simply to interpret the statutes of this State when they involve inconsistent provisions, and to apply the statutes when they are clear and unambiguous; * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.