Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 138 W. Va. 852 - Crawford v. Carson

138 W. Va. 852 - Crawford v. Carson’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
states following
December 1999
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 1999

21 state decisions

8019531960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hess v. Pawloski · Wuchter v. Pizzutti · Vinal v. Core · Owen v. Appalachian Power Co. · Humphreys v. Newport News & M. V. Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Venue of an action exists by virtue of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) Any civil action or other proceeding, except where it is otherwise specially provided, may hereafter be brought in the circuit court of any county: (1) Wherein any of the defendants may reside or the cause of action arose, except that an action of .«ejectment or unlawful detainer must be brought in the county wherein the land sought to be recovered or some part thereof, is; or (2) If a corporation be a defendant, wherein its principal office is, or wherein its mayor, president or other chief officer resides; or if its principal office be not in this state, and its mayor, president or other chief officer do not reside therein, wherein it does business; or if it be a corporation organized under the laws of this state, which has its principal office located outside of this state, and which has no office or place of business within the state, the circuit court of the county in which the plaintiff resides or the circuit court of the county in which the seat of state government is located shall have jurisdiction of.all actions at law or suits in equity against such corporation, where the cause of action arose in this state or grew out of the rights of stockholders with respect to corporate management; ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.