¶1The verdict was against the weight of the evidence and for that reason the judgment and order are reversed .and a new trial granted, on condition that the plaintiff pay-the costs of the trial and disbursements-tódáte, Woodward, Jenks, Burr and Carr, JJ., concurred; Thomas, J., dissented as to defendant William J. Howard.
139 A.D. 912
Wells v. Howard
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 15, 1910
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1910-06-15
Decided 1910-06-15