Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 Ariz. 365 - State v. Gooch

State v. Gooch’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
2
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently September 2013 · most notably State of Arizona v. Powers (2001), State v. Scott (1993)

38 state decisions

1801984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Malloy · State v. Wussler · State v. Murphy · State v. Politte · In Re the Appeal in Marcopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75755

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““a court may consider two bases: ‘1) the included offense is by its very nature always a constituent part of the major offense charged; or 2) the terms of the charging document describe the lesser offense even though the lesser offense would not always form a constituent part of the major offense charged.’” 139 Ariz. at 366 , 678 P.2d at 947 , quoting In re Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-75755, 111 Ariz. 103, 105 , 523 P.2d 1304, 1306 (1974).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] person ... commits facilitation if, acting with knowledge that another person is committing or intends to commit an offense, such person knowingly provides such other person with means or opportunity for the commission of the offense and which in fact aids such person to commit the offense.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.