Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 CALAPP 303 - Petersen v. Lyders

Petersen v. Lyders’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
February 1974
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 1974

5 federal appellate · 1 district · 10 state decisions

9019341940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lawrence v. . Fox · National Bank v. Grand Lodge · Meyerson v. New Idea Hosiery Co. · Hall v. Marston · Dean v. Walker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is elementary that a set-off may not be invoked unless the parties and the debts are mutual and that the doctrine of mutuality requires that the debts be due to and from the same persons in the same capacity.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.