Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 CALAPP3D 234 - People v. Malgren

People v. Malgren’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
August 2020
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably 53 Cal. 3d 1115 - People v. Jones (1991), People v. Jackson (2016)

36 state decisions

17019831990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 46 Cal. 2d 818 - People v. Watson · 26 Cal. 3d 557 - People v. Johnson · 25 Cal. 3d 668 - People v. Flannel · 17 Cal. 3d 24 - People v. Kelly · 32 Cal. 3d 307 - People v. Wickersham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““You have heard evidence in this case regarding the use of a dog in the apprehension and identification of the alleged perpetrator of the offense charged herein. “In determining the weight, if any, to be given this testimony, you are instructed to consider the following factors: “1. Whether or not the handler was qualified by training and experience to use the dog. “2. Whether or not the dog was adequately trained in tracking humans. “3. Whether or not the dog has been found reliable in tracking humans. “4. Whether the dog was placed on the track where circumstances have shown the guilty party to have been. “5. Whether or not the trail had become stale or contaminated.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.