Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 F.1d 244 - In re Spalding

In re Spalding’s Empirical Analysis

139 F. 244 · 1905

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
May 1936
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 8 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 1936

9 federal appellate · 8 district ·

901905191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Russell v. Place · In re Watts · Davis v. Brown · William Watts David Sachs · Vaccaro v. Security Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * Or, being insolvent,- applied for a receiver or trustee for his property or because of insolvency a receiver or trustee has been put in charge of his property under the laws of a state, of a territory, or of the United States.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““If the court had merely appointed a receiver, without reciting the grounds of its judgment, the record could have been referred to, or the grounds shown by evidence aliunde. Russell v. Place, 94 U. S. 608 [ 24 L. Ed. 214 ]; Davis v. Brown, 94 U. S. 428 [ 24 L. Ed. 204 ].” In re Spalding (C. C. A., 2d Circuit) 139 Fed. 244 . 247, 71 C. C. A. 370 , 373.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““Giving subdivision a (4) tile construction which, its language demands, we are of the opinion that it does not make a receivership an act of bankruptcy unless it was procured upon the application of the insolvent himself, and while insolvent; and does not make the putting a receiver in charge of the property of an insolvent an act of bankruptcy unless this was done because of insolvency.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.