Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 F.2d 427 - Harrison v. Carroll

Harrison v. Carroll’s Empirical Analysis

139 F.2d 427 · 1943

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
8
states following
May 2008
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 3 district · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently May 2008 · most notably 147 W. Va. 352 - Payne v. Kinder (1962), Sheila Ilina Boland, Etc. v. J. Spencer Love (1955)

18 federal appellate · 3 district · 11 state decisions

2101943195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dickinson v. Maryland Casualty Co. · Hinton v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America · Odden v. Union Indemnity Co. · Crowell v. Duncan · Myers v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * but the District Judge found upon sufficient evidence that the car had been driven by another person than her son to her knowledge on at least one prior occasion and that her authority to her son to use the car on Sundays for his own purposes and his own pleasure was so broad as to imply her consent to its use in any ordinary manner that he might see fit. We agree with the District Judge that the temporary loan of the car by the son to Going in order that he might make the short run to Danville and return for the common purposes of the group was well within the scope of the express permission granted by the owner to her son.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “shall insure the insured named therein and any other person using or responsible for the use of any such motor vehicle with the consent, express or implied, of such insured”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.