Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 F.3d 1210 - Moore v. Payless Shoe Source, Inc.

Moore v. Payless Shoe Source, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

139 F.3d 1210 · 1998

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
March 2005
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 2601 (§ 2 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2611 (§ 101 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2612 (§ 102 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2614 (§ 104 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2617 (§ 107 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (§ 101 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12112 (§ 102 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)

Relies on Henderson v. Brown · McKinney v. Baldwin · Hutson v. McDonnell Douglas Corp. · Kennedy v. Applause, Inc. · Halperin v. Abacus Technology Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An employee who is `unable to come to work on a regular basis [is] unable to satisfy any of the functions of the job in question, much less the essential ones.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “1250 'hours of service' during the 12 months prior to commencement of leave.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a qualified individual with a disability because of the disability.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.