Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 F.3d 571 - Todd v. Rush County Schools

Todd v. Rush County Schools’s Empirical Analysis

139 F.3d 571 · 1998

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
May 2002
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton · Chandler v. Miller · Schaill Kross v. Tippecanoe County School Corporation · Todd ex rel. Todd v. Rush County Schools

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because the panel decision gives a very broad reading to the Supreme Court’s holding in Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton, 515 U.S. 646 , 115 S.Ct. 2386 , 132 L.Ed.2d 564 (1995), and seemingly fails to take fully into account the Supreme Court’s holding in Chandler v. Miller, 520 U.S. 305 , 117 S.Ct. 1295 , 137 L.Ed.2d 513 (1997), further review is warranted if we are to avoid sanctioning, by implication, the use of a urine sample as the price of admission to the public schools in this circuit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “Exclusion of a high school student from all extracurricular activities deprives that student of a great deal of what the modern American high school has to offer in terms of academic and personal development.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.