Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

139 F.3d 903

Docket No. 96-56523. D.C. No. CV-95-3398-CBM.

Chambless v. K M E Hanley

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued and Submitted: Feb. 2, 1998. Decided Feb. 25, 1998.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Relies on California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform v. Creekside Care Convalescent

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Consuelo B. Marshall, District Judge, Presiding.

Before PREGERSON, BEEZER, and HALL, Circuit Judges.

¶1

MEMORANDUM*

¶2

We affirm the order denying defendant's motion for summary judgment for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion.

¶3

AFFIRMED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

/139/f3d/903 · .json · Public domain