¶1 Terrell Joyner seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Joyner’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See Joyner v. Cherry, No. CA-05-184-2 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 8, 2005 & entered Apr. 12, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 DISMISSED