Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

139 F. App'x 572

Hatten v. DeWalt

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided July 26, 2005

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2005-07-26

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2005-07-26

PER CURIAM:

¶1 James Donald Hatten, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hatten v. DeWalt, No. CA-04-3545-WDQ (D. Md. filed Feb. 28, 2005 & entered Mar. 1, 2005). We *573 dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED

/139/fappx/572 · .json · Public domain