Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 Fla. 645 - Simmons v. State

Simmons v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
1
states following
September 1984
most recently cited

63 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently September 1984 · most notably Clark v. State (1978), 104 So. 2d 524 - Gordon v. State (1958)

63 state decisions

240193919401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Akin v. State · Watt v. People · Carlile v. State · Deas v. State · Rowe v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * but no accused person shall be compelled to give testimony against himself, nor shall any prosecuting attorney be permitted before the jury or court to comment on the failure of the accused to testify in his own behalf, * * *." (Emphasis added.)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““We hold that calling the attention of the jury, by the prosecuting officer of the state, to the failure of the accused to testify in his own behalf at any preliminary proceeding or the present trial, no matter how innocently it may be done, comes within the exception and deprives the defendant of the protection the statute was intended to secure, and of his constitutional right to a fair and impartial trial. Rowe v. State, supra [ 87 Fla. 17 , 98 So. 613 ]; Jackson v. State, 45 Fla. 38 ., 34 So. 243 , 3 Ann.Cas. 164; Annotations, 68 A.L.R. 1108 ; 84 A.L.R. 785 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “subject to the exception that if the improper remarks are of such character that neither rebuke nor retraction may entirely destroy their sinister influence, in such event, a new trial should be awarded, regardless of the want of objection or exception.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.