Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 FRD 85 - Felder v. Wyman

Felder v. Wyman’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
4
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

5 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2015

5 district · 4 state decisions

70199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Hickman v. Taylor · Baltimore City Department of Social Services v. Bouknight · National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Claiborne Hardware Co. · Rogers v. First National Bank of Peoria

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Absent a privilege no party is entitled to restrict an opponent's access to a witness ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “); Doe v. Eli Lilly & Co., 99 F.R.D. 126, 128 (D.D.C. 1983) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.