Milton v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis
1913
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently June 2015
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on City of East Dallas v. State ex rel. Putz · Capital City Water Co. v. State ex rel. Macdonald · Jones v. State ex rel. Snodgrass · McWilliams v. Jacobs · Pope v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In this State there is no statute specifically prescribing the procedure in a quo warranto proceeding .... Where a [writ of quo warranto] is filed ... it is considered a purely civil remedy, to be governed by the rules of pleading that are applicable in other civil actions. [Cits.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Anderson v. Flake
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.