Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 Ga. App. 129 - Smith v. State

139 Ga. App. 129 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
December 1999
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently December 1999

15 state decisions

80197619801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · 122 Ga. App. 455 - Willis v. State · 126 Ga. App. 841 - Jones v. State · 125 Ga. App. 747 - Holtzendorf v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`(A) reasonable search for weapons for the protection of the police officer, (is permitted) where he has reason to believe that he is dealing with an armed and dangerous individual, regardless of whether he has probable cause to arrest the individual for a crime. The officer need not be absolutely certain that the individual is armed; the issue is whether a reasonably prudent [officer] in the circumstances would be warranted in the belief that his safety or that of others was in danger.' [Cit.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “he must be able to point to particular facts from which he reasonably inferred that the individual was armed and dangerous.” Sibron v. New York, 392 U. S. 40, 64 (88 SC 1889, 20 LE2d 917) (1968); see also Smith v. State, 139 Ga. App. 129, 132 (2), supra.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.