Mount v. Apao.’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2 district · 9 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 6801 (§ 501 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999)) · 15 U.S.C. § 6807 (§ 507 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (Financial Services Modernization Act of 1999))
Relies on Kamaka v. Goodsill Anderson Quinn & Stifel · Sierra Club v. Department of Transportation of the State · Price v. AIG Hawaii Ins. Co., Inc. · Gillan v. Government Employees Insurance Co. · County of Hawai'i v. C & J Coupe Family Ltd. Partnership
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The moving party bears the burden of demonstrating that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact with respect to the essential elements of the claim[.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Where the language of the statute is plain and unambiguous, our only duty is to give effect to its plain and obvious meaning.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]here it is determined that the nonjudicial foreclosure of a property is wrongful, the sale of the property is invalid and voidable at the election of the mortgagor, who shall then regain title to and possession of the property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mount, Jr. v. Apao
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.