State v. Pacquing.’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
January 2025
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Connally v. General Construction Co. · Kolender v. Lawson · Smith v. Goguen · United States v. Williams
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where a statute sets forth with reasonable clarity all essential elements of the crime intended to be punished, and fully defines the offense in unmistakable terms readily comprehensible to persons of common understanding, a charge drawn in the language of the statute will be sufficient.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]here the decision below is correct it must be affirmed by the appellate court even though the lower tribunal gave the wrong reason for its action.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“) section 708-852 (2014) (Count 1), Unauthorized Possession of Confidential Personal Information (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Marks · State v. Blyenburg
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.