Dannenberg v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
2 district · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 21 Cal. 3d 859 - Betts v. Board of Administration · 45 Cal. 2d 128 - Allen v. City of Long Beach · State v. Wheeler · Bremer v. Weeks · Spina v. Consolidated Police & Firemen's Pension Fund Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may preclude the relitigation of a fact or issue that was previously determined in a prior action on a different claim or cause of action between the same parties or their privies”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“if the particular issue in question was actually litigated, finally decided, and essential to the earlier valid and final judgment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.