Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 HAW 62 - State v. Subia.

State v. Subia.’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Wallace · State v. Bannister · State v. Gano · State v. Assaye · State v. Pauline

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A proper foundation for introducing a test result . . . include[s] expert testimony regarding: (1) the qualifications of the expert; (2) whether the expert employed valid techniques to obtain the test result; and (3) whether the measuring instrument is in proper working order.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A fundamental evidentiary rule is that before the result of a test made out of the court may be introduced into evidence, a foundation must be laid showing that the test result can be relied on as a substantive fact.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.