Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 139 KAN 22 - Willt v. Feikert

Willt v. Feikert’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 1944
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on McClain v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. · Webb ex rel. Webb v. Lipperd · Bagnall v. Hunt · Gamble v. Hodges · 10 Kan. App. 27 - Denton v. Groves

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Alleged errors not brought to the attention of the trial court cannot form a basis for review in an appellate court.” (Syl. ¶ 3.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.