Larrick v. Jacobson’s Empirical Analysis
1934
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 1966
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Eureka Bank v. Bay · Dodd v. Boles · Fisher v. Rakestraw · Estey v. Holdren · Roach v. Karr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A wife who can read and write, and who at the request of her husband signs with him a mortgage on their homestead but does not know that it is a mortgage and does not understand its nature or effect, cannot avoid the mortgage where no fraud has been practiced nor duress exercised on her to procure her signature thereto.” (Syl. ¶1.) (See, also, Smyser v. Kline, 129 Kan. 72 , 281 Pac. 927 ; and Mid-West Lamber Co. v. Wagner, 133 Kan. 405 , 300 Pac. 1067 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“mainly a question of foreclosing a mortgage on a homestead,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“unquestionably a matter for the court only.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.