Murphy v. Hobbs’s Empirical Analysis
1934
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 1964
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Meffert v. State Board of Medical Registration & Examination · Schaake v. Dolley · State ex rel. Brewster v. Mohler · Mid-West Photo Play Corp. v. Miller · Brinkley v. Hassig
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“' “The exercise of such power is merely the exercise of administrative discretion. If this power is abused, the courts are open to the aggrieved party, if not by some statutory review, then by the extraordinary and.prerogative remedies of injunction or mandamus.” (1. e. 472.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Butler v. Rude
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.